Видео

They really need to get ontop of the rampant aimbotting thats snuck into the game the last year. It used to be every now and then now there can be several in every game.

i would love to see Swiss vehicles in game especially tanks like the Panzer 58,61,68 and the 68et (the tank in the thumbnail )

As a German main here's my take on them. 1. As mentioned 6.7 - 7.7 gap - Why? if you don't have the removed 7.0 tanks or the 7.3 premiums all you get is the kugel at 7.0 and the Weisel at 7.3 If you use only one of these 2 vehicles you are a detriment to your team if you get a full down tier because you are uptiering the people on your team and will have no meaningful impact 99% of the time. 2. Needs actual good top tier CAS planes. Usually, its Germany vs USSR and USA for me 99% of the time so you get creamed by air and have no one playing air besides the hunter at 9.7 and even that doesn't compare to the A-10 and SU-25k at 10.0. 3. No tanks in the BR area of 10.7 to 11.3 - No the one death leaving PL players don't count as mentioned above I usually get put against USA and USSR together at 10.3 so if you get uptiered you hope for the one death leaving PL players but your mostly screwed either way. 4. More premium and TT vehicles in the 10.0 and 10.3 area - As mentioned above again getting put against USA and USSR together is insane as both nations get large lineups of good vehicles that you can buy (USSR) and buy and still get strong vehicles in the TT (USA). Germany on the other hand gets 1 10.3 premium, 1 10.3 MBT and 2 light vehicles at 10.0. This results in most people 1 death leaving in the panzer battalion and your team gets screwed. Giving them a 10.0 premium would at least make it so the premium players can buy multiple vehicles and hopefully not one death leave anymore (or at least make it so they don't have that excuse). Thats how I would flesh out the German TT based on my experiences at playing Germany.

howd u get the tank in the hangar to face the wrong way..?

For everyone except ussr: pasir s1 competitor

Wish gaijin would give the US the Bradley Linebacker or the Stryker Shorad, since we will likely never be getting what the US really uses, the PAC or Nike system

I hope they add namer and eitan for israel ASAP. They need it and would be a pretry nice addition. Imagine a eitan with a sabra 120 turret (feeling like the patria) and the namer with a spike and 30mm would be pretty fun to play. I think a a buff to MK4's turret and those vehicles would bring israel backup to life.

mig 25 fox bat?

Japan feels miserable to play at specific brackets, 9.3 lineup is a joke especially after the M735 nerf, the Type 93 isn't 9.3 worthy and should be 9.0 at least there you can run it with the fun IFV's. 11.0 is strong ground wise but no viable SPAA after the Tan Sam got sent to 11.7 (competed with the fucking Pantsir now). But major issue is rank 6, that was probably the worst grind I've ever done getting to 11.0 there

he-111 h-22 (the goober with the V-1) hs293 and maybe the fennek armored car? I mean it does have a 40mm automatic grenade launcher with about 78 if I remember mm of pen so, it could be classed as a light tank/apc? it also has a periscope and some other variants even had spike launchers

what is the player account thing? i see many youtubers having it

7:47:16 didn't know MCC had halo3 odst, look like i was wrong.

very nice to hear you mention about the italian coastal, funnily enough I am one ship ahead of you in terms of both spaded and bought coastal vessels for itally which is kinda funny. We've been trying to complete the italian coastal stuff on stream this last month and it's quite a painful experience. Not as bad as the british coastal. The fairmiles have nice guns but they get two shot by 20mm at the very least. I was so happy when I finally spaded the british coastal tree. The main difference between the two though is that italy doesn't really have much to go for. The Albatros is nice and look forward to playing it but the saetta... Although it has those nice netuno missiles it's still a 4.7 pt boat, meaning every game will pretty much be heavily cruiser focussed. 5 inch gun destroyers are a pain to deal with for coastal frigates, let alone having to deal with cruisers too

They should add the T250 for the American AA bracket. That huge gap between the BRs annoy me greatly.

Israel needs the adams spaa but at least the namer is coming this patch

Israel needs the adams spaa but at least the namer is coming this patch

As a Japan main, if I were to chose a single vehicle to be added, it would be the Komatsu CCV (which actually got passed to the devs this month (again)). Not only would it be an overall fun vehicle and likely very effective, playing like an RCV on steroids, it would greatly help Japan's high tier AA capabilities, providing a different approach from the Type 93 and Type 81

Otomatic need to go down to 10.7 BR ! we have 2s38 with proximity shells at 10.0 and the 2S6 with 10KM range missiles at 10.7 why not the otomatic too ? And the tor-M1 needs thermals, its very hard to see targerts too far without locking the radar

Tiannamen square chad posters did nothing wrong

You face Russia's strongest hitters as low as 8.0 with the strongest rounds and ERA...why

The u.s tree really needs the the a37 supertweet

For Japan high tier, moving the Type 90 from 11.0 to 10.3 or 10.7 would help it a lot. The main battle tanks go from Type 74 E/F at 9.0 to 11.0. There is no 10 at all for Japan and when you're playing the other vehicles (the Type 16s at 9.3 and Type 93) you're going to be uptiered 90% of the time because the 10.3 prem spam. The Type 74s at 9.0 can't fight at 10.3 when thermals and better optics exist, its basically just a dead weight and outclassed by literally every vehicle.

Cheating is the biggest issue in the game, particularly at higher BR’s. Gaijin need to really get serious about combating it. I can’t understand the cheaters mindset, absolute wankers!

Funnily enough, i think the best Rank 1 japanese ground vehicle is the Ta-Se.

I'd love to see more Strykers for the US.

germany also just needs more 7.0-7.7 in general. There are only 2 7.7 tanks if you dont count premiums. So making a loadout for 7.0-7.7 is very hard since you have 1 medium tank and 1 light tank (non premium) and thats it. If they were to allow us to get the tiger 2 105 or panther 2 again it would probably fix the issues

For soviet air tree also, they are missing good CAS planes at 6.7. it used to be larger gap from 6.0 to 7.7 but the addition of Su-9 made the gap bit smaller

easy fix, remove all fantasy vehicles that are way too strong or BR too low: SU25 sm3, Pantsir, 2S38, Strela, TU-2s, mig-15bis, mig21-pfm, kv-1e, sk7. looks like removing Soviets would be even easier to fix this game.

I want Stinger's to work correctly, the M247 to get ammunition it can actually defend itself with again, and a single update where Russia doesn't get something, especially not another MBT.

As a japan main, having more than one strike aircraft, preferably one higher than br 2

Canadian tree :'(

No time stamps no watch

They should stop whit modern stuff for a while and add more ww2 dtuff there is a lot that can be add and thst br range is the most played

More pre-war, ww2,, less cold war...

Italy, Sweden and Japan don't have a tech tree heavy tank either. For Japan and Italy it's a bit difficult to find such a thing, although the premium Tigers for each exist, and now also the King Tiger for Sweden, but Sweden could very easily have a heavy tank in the line-up in the form of a Finnish captured KV-1, and although not a heavy tank, a Finnish captured ISU-152.

Australia needs to exist, maybe with a combined tree with Canada.

Right now playing France 11.7. 1) I feel like France could do with a better round to make up for the having no armour 2) Anti radiation missiles to mix up anti air who I feel are too strong right now

Personally I believe Russia lacks 10.0 premiums and squadron vehicles.

I am sure player base of this game is pretty much mature and giving chat bans left and right for using strong language it's a dumb policy. I was getting raped by a helicopter but somehow were staying alive. Heli were flying all around me shoot at me and i was curious why no one is shooting down this heli. And then i saw shilka chilling at our spawn. And i asked the guy why he did not shoot down that heli. And he answer to me that he does whatever he likes. This is the rude answer. So i call him an idiot or something like that. Then this guy literally said that he is reporting me for offensive language and i got chat ban. Gaijin not gonna ban this guy for being passive in a game and ruining game for me for someone else for whole team by being passive. Because gaijin cannot prove that the guy is playing passive. you can find million excuses why the guy didn't shoot the enemies helicopter, right. But gaijin can prove that you said rude word in chat. And they furiously banning anyone who said something without looking intro context. This is ridiculous this is hilarious this is idiocracy. Bots and cheaters playing for months ruining games for hundred of thoughts of players and gaijin do not care. But once some very special snowflake sees rude word in chat gaijin is here. It's just dumb.

Japan need a top tier cas

oh ya, GAWD FORBID, anyone type Tiananmem square in chat..... 🙄

just grinded for the F8U2 on the US side. My god... the pain of running the Demon with no flares vs russians with R-60M's... Almost like a late 50's/early 60's aircraft vs modern missiles is alittle bit unbalanced... Also the damn SU-25 pretty much have better engine performance as well with only the top speed capped

not really a need but i'd like to have a cas that is not a su-25 maybe 24 or 34 and def a mig 31. would also be cool to get su-37 but i think that would have to wait for counterparts in american/german tech trees.

i think the reason america doesnt have that much spaa is because every tank has a roof 50 cal

My Main issue as a German main, also is mostly the BR of the 262s. Like, America got its early jets a whole BR lower, so i dont see the reason why the 262s have to be that high in BR, beccause they are littarly 5 years behind in Jet development. Another problem i have is, that germany if the only Nation that didnt got its unique Attilary, WHERE THE HECK IS MY BELOVED PZH.2000 ??? But i also play a lot of france and the lack of AA always bothered me. France also needs some more Light tanks in my opinion and Tankdestroyer at low tier. Like, there is plenty of Interwar and WW1 Tankdestroyer-Like tanks that would fit into the game.

12:50 Japan irl has pretty much zero CAS options in terms of guided munitions. Because their doctrine in the event of an invasion is ‘JASDF and JMSDF sink most of their ships and JASDF shoot down most of their planes. Anything that gets through the JGSDF mops up with relative ease. There’s simply no reason for Japan to have Air to ground munitions

It's amazing that the panstir and the flarakrad are the same BR. no russian bias.

Before watching the video, I'll add my thoughts on what I would like to see for the nations I play. For Germany, we already have a lot of Bf109s available, but I feel that some key variants are omitted, and the inclusion of certain ones but not others seems incomplete. The recent addition of the Bf109C-1 was welcome. I'd love to see the Bf109D-3 added as an optional foldered vehicle with it. This is another Jumo 210 powered 109, but has 20mm cannons mounted in the wing. I would suggest an RB battle rating of 2.0. The inclusion of trop variants for the Bf109 seems inconsistent. I would like to see this rectified. We have both the F-4 and F-4/Trop, but we have a tech tree G-2/Trop and not a standard G-2. The G-6/Trop and any trop Emils are also missing. There is a small jump from the G-6 at 4.7 to the G-14 at 5.3, missing 5.0. A late production G-6 could fill this gap (the G-6 went through a lot of changes in its production, I'm sure one configuration that works for 5.0 could be found). AS variants should be considered The Bf109T would make a good event vehicle. Sweden has a Ju86, it's a German aircraft. Germany should have one too. Folder it with the He111H-3. The do17Z-7 is a niche vehicle. Adding the Z-10 with a radar would be decent if Gaijin ever wanted to implement proper air rb night battles. There are a lot of Me262 variants missing. V-8 prototype for a pure bomber variant. Put it before the Ar234 in the tech tree. The A-1a/U5 which carries an extra pair of Mk108s The A-2a/U1, similar to the standard A-2a except it has a bomb sight. The B-1a trainer, with guns retained (not all had them removed), and the ability to carry bombs. The B-1a/U2 two seat night fighter, which could carry bombs. Ar240 for the zerstorer line. various Me210 variants - though this niche is well covered with the more successful Me410. Fw190D-15 torpedo bomber For the ground stuff, an SPAA between the Wirbelwind and Ostwind II! Germany seems to have a ton of unavailable or premium light tank variants. Bring some over to the tech tree. Bring back Maus.

Germany needs fighter from netherlands or denmark or switzerland so it can fill the gap

Heya TEC. I found the name of the game I was talking about. It was "Natural Selection 2" and I believe 1 of the devs went on to create "Subnautica." Either that or the connection between the 2 games was an easter egg. BTW that RTS mode idea you spoke of is something that really slipped my mind. Now IDK if the teams would sacrifice a spot for the "commander" or they'd get another player that only played that role (maybe the coach if they allow it in tournaments). When it comes to the AA/ART suggestions I agree with you but I want you to remember that whenever you see a suggestion like this coming from me, I'm merely trying to think of a more realistic way to add silly/meme suggestions. I don't actually care to have more mechanics in the game since I believe we both agree that Gaijin should polish what's already here instead of adding new stuff just because we need new stuff all the time (see drones and how loved they were). I also like the challenge of trying to make these sort of suggestions work in a realistic way because it brings to light what the actual problems are with said suggestion. When you try to implement something new is when the problems show up (see night battles). Nonetheless prepare for another meme suggestion next week. It's gonna be HIGHLY REALISTIC and HISTORICALLY ACCURATE. Have a good one.